Seiniger v. Hoffacker
235 A.D. 638
| N.Y. App. Div. | 1932|
Check Treatment"Judgment affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Young, Seudder and Tompkins, JJ., concur; Lazansky, P. J., and Kapper, J., dissent upon the following grounds: (1) The proof does not show that defendants had obligated themselves to plaintiffs; (2) all the terms of a binding contract had not been arranged.