History
  • No items yet
midpage
Seibert v. Sebring
55 Pa. Super. 475
Pa. Super. Ct.
1913
Check Treatment
Per Curiam,

All that need be said in order to make clear the questions involved in this appeal and to vindicate the final decree is contained in the opinion of the learned president judge of the twenty-fifth judicial district, specially presiding, in which we all concur.

The decree is affirmed at the costs of the appellant, and it is further ordered that the defendant be allowed a period of twenty days from the date of the decree of this court within which to perform that part of the decree which reads “to remove the said sign post and its said foundation, and also to dig out of the ground all concrete or other foundation matter used in establishing the said foundation, and to fill in the hole left *483by the removal of said foundation and concrete With proper earth for sustaining sod,” and that that part of the decree relating to sodding be performed so soon thereafter as the weather will permit.

Case Details

Case Name: Seibert v. Sebring
Court Name: Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Date Published: Dec 8, 1913
Citation: 55 Pa. Super. 475
Docket Number: Appeal, No. 62
Court Abbreviation: Pa. Super. Ct.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.