History
  • No items yet
midpage
Seguin's Appeal
103 Pa. 139
Pa.
1883
Check Treatment

The opinion of the court was delivered

Per Curiam.

We think this account was adjudicated on correct principles. The guardian was charged with that part of the profits received by him, produced by the capital invested. The cestui que trust is entitled to what the capital alone produced : but not to the soperadded product of skill, industry and labor in the business in which the capital was invested.

The appellant having declined to elect whether she would take interest or profits, it was not error for the court to elect for her. Previous to suqli election there was no final decree. The appellant fails to show that she sustained any injury for that election.

Decree affirmed and appeal dismissed at the costs of the appellant.

Case Details

Case Name: Seguin's Appeal
Court Name: Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Date Published: Apr 16, 1883
Citation: 103 Pa. 139
Docket Number: No. 277
Court Abbreviation: Pa.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.