History
  • No items yet
midpage
Seeman Printery, Inc. v. SCHINLAN
241 S.E.2d 844
| N.C. | 1978
|
Check Treatment
241 S.E.2d 844 (1978)

SEEMAN PRINTERY, INC.
v.
Philip C. SCHINLAN, Individually and d/b/a Von Press.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

March 7, 1978.

Weinstein, Sturges, Odom, Bigger & Jonas, for defendant.

Mount, White, King, Hutson, Walker & Carden, for plaintiff.

Defendant's notice of appeal under GS 7A-30, 34 N.C.App. 637, 239 S.E.2d 744, dismissed ex mero motu for lack of substantial constitutional question.

Case Details

Case Name: Seeman Printery, Inc. v. SCHINLAN
Court Name: Supreme Court of North Carolina
Date Published: Mar 7, 1978
Citation: 241 S.E.2d 844
Court Abbreviation: N.C.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.