History
  • No items yet
midpage
Seelye v. Seelye
143 Ill. 264
Ill.
1892
Check Treatment
Per Curiam :

This is a proceeding, under the statute, to recover separate maintenance. The amount decreed to be paid' is less then $1000, and the facts are precisely the same as they were in Umlauf v. Umlauf, 103 Ill. 651. Eor the reasons given in that case the appeal must be dismissed. In Jenkins v. Jenkins, 104 Ill. 134, and in Johnson v. Johnson, 125 id. 510, the question of jurisdiction was not called to the attention of the court, and no decision was made in either of those cases in that respect.

Appeal dismissed.

Case Details

Case Name: Seelye v. Seelye
Court Name: Illinois Supreme Court
Date Published: Oct 31, 1892
Citation: 143 Ill. 264
Court Abbreviation: Ill.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.