History
  • No items yet
midpage
Seelig v. Fabrics Processing Corp.
269 A.D. 742
N.Y. App. Div.
1945
Check Treatment

Order and judgment affirmed, with costs. Mo opinion. Present —- Martin, P. J., Untermyer, Dore, Cohn and Callahan, JJ.; Dore and Callahan, JJ., dissent and vote to reverse and deny the motion on the ground that under the circumstances here the question of whether there was an intent to sign the memorandum by a duly authorized agent of the party to be charged is one of fact.

Case Details

Case Name: Seelig v. Fabrics Processing Corp.
Court Name: Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Date Published: Apr 20, 1945
Citation: 269 A.D. 742
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. App. Div.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.