midpage

Securities & Exchange Commission v. HickeySecurities & Exchange Commission v. Hickey

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jul 7, 2003
Nos. 01-17027, 01-17214
Versions:

ORDER

The slip opinion filed March 7, 2003, is hereby amended as follows:

At page 3512, line 7, the text “admitted violating securities laws and” shall be deleted. At page 3513, line 24, the word “no” shall be deleted and replaced by “insufficient.” At page 3513, lines 25-27, the following text shall be deleted: “Nonetheless, the district court allowed Hickey’s counsel to designate portions of the deposition of Dorothy Hickey for consideration by the court.”

With these amendments, the panel has voted to deny the petition for panel rehearing. The panel has also voted to deny the petition for rehearing en banc. The full court has been advised of the petition for rehearing en banc and no judge has requested a vote on whether to hear the matter en banc. Fed. R.App. P. 35.

The petition for panel rehearing and the petition for rehearing en banc are DENIED. No additional petitions for rehearing will be accepted in this case.

Case Details

Case Name: Securities & Exchange Commission v. Hickey
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Date Published: Jul 7, 2003
Citations: 335 F.3d 834; 2003 WL 21518010; Nos. 01-17027, 01-17214
Docket Number: Nos. 01-17027, 01-17214
Court Abbreviation: 9th Cir.
Log In
    Securities & Exchange Commission v. Hickey, 335 F.3d 834