History
  • No items yet
midpage
Secrest v. Arnett
5 Blackf. 366
Ind.
1840
Check Treatment
Blackford, J.

This suit was commenced before a justice of the peace; and the writ issued in the names of /. & R. M. Secrest, plaintiffs. Motion by the defendant, before the justice, to dismiss the suit, because the Christian names of the plaintiffs were not stated. Motion overruled. The plaintiffs then, by the names of James and Robert M. Secrest, filed their declaration, the defendant pleaded to the action, and the cause was tried. Judgment for the plaintiffs. The defendant appealed.

The Circuit Court, on the defendant’s motion, dismissed the suit for the reason urged for its dismissal before the justice.

The plaintiffs contend, that the defect in the writ was cured by the plea before the justice; but we do not think so. The objection to the writ was made and overruled, before the appearance and plea to the suit. There was therefore no waiver of the objection. The case of Eldridge v. Folwell, 3 Blackf. 207, is relied on by the plaintiffs; but in that case there was an appearance to the action, without any previous objection to the writ.

Per Curiam.

The judgment is affirmed with costs.

Case Details

Case Name: Secrest v. Arnett
Court Name: Indiana Supreme Court
Date Published: Jul 28, 1840
Citation: 5 Blackf. 366
Court Abbreviation: Ind.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.