History
  • No items yet
midpage
Secor v. Fulton
293 U.S. 517
SCOTUS
1934
Check Treatment
Per Curiam:

The appeal herein is dismissed for the want of a substantial federal question. Seattle & Renton Ry. v. Linhoff, 231 U. S. 568, 570; Enterprise Irrigation District v. Canal Co., 243 U. S. 157, 165, 166; Tidal Oil Co. v. Flanagan, 263 U. S. 444, 451; Hebert v. Louisiana, 272 U. S. 312, 316, 317; American Railway Express Co. v. Kentucky, 273 U. S. 269, 272, 273; Comer v. Washington, 292 U. S. 610; Van Schaick v. Toledo, 292 U. S. 611.

Case Details

Case Name: Secor v. Fulton
Court Name: Supreme Court of the United States
Date Published: Oct 8, 1934
Citation: 293 U.S. 517
Docket Number: No. 77
Court Abbreviation: SCOTUS
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.