No. 77 | SCOTUS | Oct 8, 1934
The appeal herein is dismissed for the want of a substantial federal question. Seattle & Renton Ry. v. Linhoff, 231 U.S. 568" date_filed="1913-12-22" court="SCOTUS" case_name="Seattle, Renton & Southern Railway Co. v. Washington Ex Rel. Linhoff">231 U. S. 568, 570; Enterprise Irrigation District v. Canal Co., 243 U.S. 157" date_filed="1917-03-06" court="SCOTUS" case_name="Enterprise Irrigation District v. Farmers Mutual Canal Co.">243 U. S. 157, 165, 166; Tidal Oil Co. v. Flanagan, 263 U.S. 444" date_filed="1924-01-07" court="SCOTUS" case_name="Tidal Oil Co. v. Flanagan">263 U. S. 444, 451; Hebert v. Louisiana, 272 U.S. 312" date_filed="1926-11-01" court="SCOTUS" case_name="Hebert v. Louisiana">272 U. S. 312, 316, 317; American Railway Express Co. v. Kentucky, 273 U.S. 269" date_filed="1927-02-21" court="SCOTUS" case_name="American Railway Express Co. v. Kentucky">273 U. S. 269, 272, 273; Comer v. Washington, 292 U.S. 610" date_filed="1934-05-21" court="SCOTUS" case_name="Ex parte Steckler">292 U. S. 610; Van Schaick v. Toledo, 292 U.S. 611" date_filed="1934-05-28" court="SCOTUS" case_name="U.S. Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Toledo">292 U. S. 611.