| N.Y. Sup. Ct. | Apr 15, 1923
This action is brought by the plaintiff, as a taxpayer, to restrain the defendants from removing the clock tower from its present location in a public square of the city.
Market street is the principal street of the city of Corning and runs easterly and westerly; Pine street runs northerly and southerly
When the tract of land which is now embraced in the city of Corning was laid out, the square in which the clock tower stands was plotted as a public place. It was formerly known as Dickinson House square, taking its name from a hotel which stands on one corner of it. Since the erection of the clock tower it has been known as Clock Tower square.
The square has been used for public purposes continuously. Before the clock tower vran erected it was unpaved and had open gutters on each side of it. The part of the square near the railroad tracks was used as a market for the sale of hay, feed and cord wood. The portion near Market street was used as a stand for draymen and baggage carriers. At one time there was located in the square a cistern with hand pump attached from which water was obtained for use at fires. - Public meetings were held in the square at different times.
The dock tower was erected in 1883 and some time thereafter the square was paved. The hay dealers and draymen were moved to another part of the village but the public use of the square was continued; public outdoor meetings were held there and at such times a platform was erected in front of the clock tower for the speakers; band concerts were given there and it was used as a place of public assemblage generally.
In 1882 Erastus Corning offered to present to the village a clock tower in memory of his father, the founder of the present city and from whom it takes its name. The village trustees appointed a committee to consider this offer. The trustees upon receiving the report of the committee adopted a resolution giving Erastus Corning permission to erect a clock tower in Dickinson House square. This resolution referred to Dickinson House square ,as lying between Market street and Tioga avenue. The tracks
The resolution afeo farther provided that the square should be improved by the construction of two small parks therein. Pursuant to this resolution a small park was constructed in Dickinoon House square and the clock tower was erected in it. The liúdo park had grass plots in «closed by curbs and contained bench.:’ for the use of the public,. These grass plots were removed a few years ago and the space a round the base of the tower was decreased in size and the remainder was concreted and raised above the level of the surrounding pavement.
On September 5, 1922, the common council of the city of Corning adopted a resolution directing the board of public works to remove the clock tower and stole the material. On September 30, 1922, the board of public work.; adopted a resolution approving the recommendation of the common council for the removal of the clock tower on the ground “ ’«hat it obstruir is the enhance to the New Pine Street bridge and is e, menace to J-e heavy traffic a.t that point,” and recommended to «the common eoiincil the t tí to hock tower be re-erected in the Court House park. On Septemb 15, 1922, the common council adopted a Kiobiion approvix., - Tie recommendation of the board oí public works.
The answer of the defendants, after setting forth fe y ■' of the erection of the new bridge over the Chemung river, alleges “ that the said tower stands in nearly the center of the line of said bridge and in the center of Pine Street square; that it is highly desirable and necessary that the center of said square be kept open for traffic from Market street, which is the main thoroughfare of the city, through said square and to the said bridge.” It thus appears that it is the purpose of defendants to open the whole square to public traffic and that the clock tower is to be removed in order to cany out such purpose.
The Clock Tower square is a public square and not a public highway; by dedication and usage it is to be maintained for public purposes; and may be used for purpose of free passage, public assemblage and public pleasure. The fact that roadways have been constructed through it does not make it a public highway. Porter v. International Bridge Co., 200 N.Y. 234" court="NY" date_filed="1910-12-16" href="https://app.midpage.ai/document/porter-v--international-bridge-co-3615935?utm_source=webapp" opinion_id="3615935">200 N. Y. 234; Buffalo, L. & R. Ry. Co. v. Hoyer, 214 id. 236.
The village trustees, therefore, had the power to lay out a small park in the square for the purpose of locating the memorial clock tower therein. Parsons v. Van Wyck, 56 A.D. 329" court="N.Y. App. Div." date_filed="1900-07-01" href="https://app.midpage.ai/document/parsons-v-wyck-5188794?utm_source=webapp" opinion_id="5188794">56 App. Div. 329; Williams v. Gallatin, 229 N.Y. 248" court="NY" date_filed="1920-06-11" href="https://app.midpage.ai/document/williams-v--gallatin-3587275?utm_source=webapp" opinion_id="3587275">229 N. Y. 248.
Corning became a city in 1890 and its charter was revised by chapter 142 of the Laws of 1905. Title IX is entitled “ Streets and highways.” Section 103, contained in this title, provides that All “ streets, parks, places, lanes and alleys * * * shall be deemed public highways of the city of Corning.” Section 105, included in this title, designated “ Laying out new streets; surveys to be recorded,” provides that the “ bonrd of public works, subject to the approval of the common council shall have power to lay out, and open streets, alleys, lanes, highways, parks and public grounds in said city, and to alter, widen, grade, construct, straighten, extend or discontinue the same.” This title and the sections embraced in it undoubtedly refer! to public highways. At the time the charter was revised it was a common practice, in naming streets, to call some of them parks; and it was the custom also in many cities to inclose small strips in the center of a street and to ornament them. These small plots of land are often referred to as parks and such small inclosed parks are portions of the highway. Matter of Curran, 38 A.D. 82" court="N.Y. App. Div." date_filed="1899-07-01" href="https://app.midpage.ai/document/curran-v-guilfoyle-5185600?utm_source=webapp" opinion_id="5185600">38 App. Div. 82.
Undoubtedly the purpose of these sections of the charter is to grant power to the board of public works to discontinue parks which axe highways, or parts of highways, but it was not intended thereby to give them authority to discontinue public parks whether large or small. That this is so is shown by section 126 which provides that “ The public park, known as block sixty-six in the city of Coming, and all other parks or places in said city shall be under the exclusive control and management of the board of public works. They shall have the control, custody and direction of'the expenditure of all funds contributed or which maybe appropriated for the grading, laying out, improving and management of said park or parks * * *. The board of public works in their annual report to the common council shall make a separate detailed statement of all moneys expended by it in the care and maintenance of the public parks and a separate detailed estimate of the amount which the board considers will be required for such care and maintenance during the ensuing year.”
The care of public parks is thus intrusted to the board of public works and it is its duty to maintain them. No power is given
A small park having been created in which to locate the clock tower, and the clock tower having been erected therein, the lands set apart thereby became impressed with a trust to hold the same for such public purpose and use and the city officials cannot, without direct legislative warrant, divert the lands to other uses.
It follows that the contemplated official acts of defendants are illegal and may be restrained in this action.
Judgment in favor of plaintiff, with costs.
Judgment accordingly.