midpage

Seavey v. PotterSeavey v. Potter

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Nov 14, 1876
Reporters:
,
By the Court.

The claim ‍‌​​​​​‌‌‌​​‌​‌‌‌‌​‌‌‌‌‌​‌‌‌​​​​​‌​​​‌‌‌‌‌‌​‌‌‌​​​‌‌​​‌​​​​‌​‌‌​​​​​‌‌‌‌​​‌‌‌‌​​​​‌​‌‌‌​‌​‌‌​‌​​​‍of the plaintiff to rescind the sale ‍‌​​​​​‌‌‌​​‌​‌‌‌‌​‌‌‌‌‌​‌‌‌​​​​​‌​​​‌‌‌‌‌‌​‌‌‌​​​‌‌​​‌​​​​‌​‌‌​​​​​‌‌‌‌​​‌‌‌‌​​​​‌​‌‌‌​‌​‌‌​‌​​​‍is wholly inconsistent with his proof in bankruptcy ‍‌​​​​​‌‌‌​​‌​‌‌‌‌​‌‌‌‌‌​‌‌‌​​​​​‌​​​‌‌‌‌‌‌​‌‌‌​​​‌‌​​‌​​​​‌​‌‌​​​​​‌‌‌‌​​‌‌‌‌​​​​‌​‌‌‌​‌​‌‌​‌​​​‍of a promissory note taken for the ‍‌​​​​​‌‌‌​​‌​‌‌‌‌​‌‌‌‌‌​‌‌‌​​​​​‌​​​‌‌‌‌‌‌​‌‌‌​​​‌‌​​‌​​​​‌​‌‌​​​​​‌‌‌‌​​‌‌‌‌​​​​‌​‌‌‌​‌​‌‌​‌​​​‍price of the goods. Ormsby v. Dearborn, 116 Mass. 386. See ‍‌​​​​​‌‌‌​​‌​‌‌‌‌​‌‌‌‌‌​‌‌‌​​​​​‌​​​‌‌‌‌‌‌​‌‌‌​​​‌‌​​‌​​​​‌​‌‌​​​​​‌‌‌‌​​‌‌‌‌​​​​‌​‌‌‌​‌​‌‌​‌​​​‍also Bassett v. Brown, 105 Mass. 551. Exceptions overruled.

Case Details

Case Name: Seavey v. Potter
Court Name: Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Date Published: Nov 14, 1876
Citations: 121 Mass. 297; 1876 Mass. LEXIS 360
Court Abbreviation: Mass.
Log In