Sears, Roebuck and Co., Appellant, v Patchogue Associates, LLC, Respondent.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
928 N.Y.S.2d 476
The plaintiff did not commence the instant action until 2008, well over six years after the causes of action accrued. In opposition, the plaintiff failed to raise a triable issue of fact (see Alvarez v Prospect Hosp., 68 NY2d 320, 324 [1986]). Accordingly, the Supreme Court properly granted the defendant‘s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint as time-barred.
The plaintiff‘s remaining contentions have been rendered academic in light of our determination. Skelos, J.P., Leventhal, Austin and Sgroi, JJ., concur.
