History
  • No items yet
midpage
Searle v. Gardner
10 Sadler 163
Pa.
1888
Check Treatment
Per Curiam:

The learned judge of the court below has so fully and satisfactorily disposed of this case, in his opinion setting forth his reasons for entering judgment for the defendant non obstante veredicto, that nothing is left for us to do> but to concur, not only in the judgment, but also in the opinion.

Judgment affirmed.

Case Details

Case Name: Searle v. Gardner
Court Name: Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Date Published: Apr 23, 1888
Citation: 10 Sadler 163
Docket Number: No. 417
Court Abbreviation: Pa.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.