History
  • No items yet
midpage
Searcy v. Progressive Insurance
3:22-cv-02803
N.D. Tex.
Apr 19, 2023
Check Treatment
Docket

CANDACE SEARCY v. PROGRESSIVE INSURANCE

Civil Action No. 3:22-CV-2803-X-BN

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION

April 19, 2023

ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

The United States Magistrate Judge made findings, conclusions, and a recommendation in this case. [Doc. No. 19]. Searcy filed an objection in which she argued that her damages meet the amount in controversy standard. The District Court reviewed de novo those portions of the proposed findings, conclusions, and recommendation to which objection was made and reviewed the proposed findings, conclusions, and recommendation for plain error. Finding none, the Court ACCEPTS the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge and DISMISSES the suit for lack of jurisdiction.

IT IS SO ORDERED this 19th day of April, 2023.

BRANTLEY STARR

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

1

Case Details

Case Name: Searcy v. Progressive Insurance
Court Name: District Court, N.D. Texas
Date Published: Apr 19, 2023
Citation: 3:22-cv-02803
Docket Number: 3:22-cv-02803
Court Abbreviation: N.D. Tex.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Log In