History
  • No items yet
midpage
Seaboard Air Line Ry. Co. v. Savage
109 So. 620
| Ala. | 1926
|
Check Treatment

The evidence may have been without conflict as to the interest of the witnesses Florida and Ramsey in this or like causes which would affect the credibility of their testimony, and appellant may have been entitled to the charge (7) which the court refused (to which proposition appellant cites Bynon v. State, 117 Ala. 80, 23 So. 640, 67 Am. St. Rep. 163, and other cases), still the inquiry thus proposed would involve this court in the examination of a question of fact, as this court has held on several occasions (Ex parte Steverson,177 Ala. 384, 58 So. 992, and cases there cited), and will not be indulged on applications for certiorari to the Court of Appeals. Postal Tel. Cable Co. v. Minderhout, 195 Ala. 420,71 So. 91. Without, therefore, deciding anything as to the question raised against the opinion of the Court of Appeals, the petition is denied.

Writ denied.

ANDERSON, C. J., and SAYRE, GARDNER, and MILLER, JJ., concur.

Case Details

Case Name: Seaboard Air Line Ry. Co. v. Savage
Court Name: Supreme Court of Alabama
Date Published: May 27, 1926
Citation: 109 So. 620
Docket Number: 7 Div. 648.
Court Abbreviation: Ala.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.