174 P. 85 | Cal. Ct. App. | 1918
This is an appeal prosecuted under what is known as the alternative method, a method characterized by Mr. Justice Shaw in Estate of Gamble,
The statements of facts in the briefs of the respective parties agree in showing, and extracts from the findings of fact indicate, that the action is one to recover the reasonable value of goods sold and delivered. The statements of fact made in the 'brief of the respondent, and the direction for judgment as stated in the findings, printed in appellant's brief, show that the trial court in its judgment allowed interest upon the claim sued on from the date of the last delivery of goods; but in an action for the reasonable value of goods on an open account interest is allowable only from the day upon which a balance is ascertained. (Erickson v. Stockton T. C. R. Co.,
The judgment is modified by striking therefrom such part thereof as allows interest on the principal sum for which *446 judgment is awarded the respondent, and as so modified it is affirmed.
Conrey, P. J., and James, J., concurred.
A petition to have the cause heard in the supreme court, after judgment in the district court of appeal, was denied by the supreme court on August 1, 1918.