Scrimenti v. Dry Harbor Nursing HomeScrimenti v. Dry Harbor Nursing Home
The plaintiff failed to seek entry of a default judgment within one year following the defendants’ default in answering the complaint. Thus, the complaint was subject to dismissal unless the plaintiff could establish a reasonable excuse for the delay and the existence of a meritorious cause of action (see McGovern v O’Connor, 256 AD2d 501 [1998]; Blades v Butler Cab Corp., 176 AD2d 698, 699 [1991]; Rendelman v Southside Hosp., 141 AD2d 521, 522 [1988]). The plaintiff failed to provide a reasonable excuse for the more than six-year delay in seeking to enter a default judgment (see Perricone v City of New York, 62 NY2d 661, 663 [1984]; Wilson v Massapequa Gen. Hosp., 180 AD2d 791 [1992]; Rafiq v Weston, 171 AD2d 783, 784 [1991]; Monzon v Sony Motor, 115 AD2d 714 [1985]). Accordingly, the Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion in granting the defendants’ motion to dismiss the complaint pursuant to
Schmidt, J.P., Ritter, Mastro, Fisher and Dillon, JJ., concur.