Appeal, No. 41 | Pa. Super. Ct. | Oct 11, 1915
Opinion by
The court below refused to allow an amendment to a bill in equity, to change the name of the defendant from certain named individuals — “representing themselves and all others interested in a certain unincorpo
Following the rule declared in Wright v. Copper Co., 206 Pa. 274" court="Pa." date_filed="1903-05-18" href="https://app.midpage.ai/document/wright-v-eureka-tempered-copper-co-6247246?utm_source=webapp" opinion_id="6247246">206 Pa. 274; Girardi v. Lumber Co., 232 Pa. 1" court="Pa." date_filed="1911-05-17" href="https://app.midpage.ai/document/girardi-v-laquin-lumber-co-6250734?utm_source=webapp" opinion_id="6250734">232 Pa. 1; Tonge v. Item Publishing Co., 244 Pa. 417; White v. Fayette Auto Co., 43 Pa. Super. 532" court="Pa. Super. Ct." date_filed="1910-07-20" href="https://app.midpage.ai/document/white-co-v-fayette-automobile-co-6276767?utm_source=webapp" opinion_id="6276767">43 Pa. Superior Ct. 532, the court below refused to allow the amendment.
The order so made is affirmed.