History
  • No items yet
midpage
Scovel v. Pennington County
66 S.D. 75
S.D.
1938
Check Treatment
PER 'CURIAM.

The above-entitled matter is before us upon the motion of respondent to dismiss the appeal upon the ground that controversy has ceased to exist and that all questions involved have become moot.

We are convinced, however, that the judgment of the learned trial court, if left unreversed, will preclude the appellant county as to a matter vital to its rights. Under the settled law of this jurisdiction such a cause has not become moot and should not be disposed of summarily upon motion for dismissal. Clarke et al. v. Beadle County, 40 S. D. 597, 169 N. W. 23; State ex rel. Coolsaet et al. v. City of Veblen et al., 56 S. D. 394, 228 N. W. 802; City of Brookings v. Martinson, 60 S. D. 127, 243 N. W. 915.

The motion is therefore denied.

All the Judges concur.

Case Details

Case Name: Scovel v. Pennington County
Court Name: South Dakota Supreme Court
Date Published: Mar 7, 1938
Citation: 66 S.D. 75
Docket Number: File No. 8148
Court Abbreviation: S.D.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.