Case Information
*1 THIRD DIVISION
DOYLE, P. J.,
MARKLE and PADGETT, JJ. NOTICE: Motions for reconsideration must be physically received in our clerk’s office within ten days of the date of decision to be deemed timely filed.
https://www.gaappeals.us/rules
April 22, 2025 In the Court of Appeals of Georgia
A25A0036. STUBBS v. LOCAL HOMES, LLC.
P ADGETT , Judge.
In this dispossessory case, Richard B. Miller and Scottie Stubbs seek review of the trial court’s final judgment against Stubbs and award of attorney fees under OCGA § 9-15-14 to plaintiff Local Homes, LLC (“Local Homes”) against Miller and Stubbs. For the reasons that follow, we conclude that we lack jurisdiction to consider this untimely appeal, which we dismiss.
The following facts do not appear to be disputed. Local Homes filed this dispossessory action in state court, seeking possession of certain premises, past-due rent, rent accruing through final judgment, and various fees and costs. Stubbs lived on the premises, and Miller represented Stubbs in the state court case. In September *2 2023, Local Homes filed a motion seeking the payment of rent into the court’s registry under the dispossessory statute, which the trial court granted. Later in September, the state court granted Local Homes a writ of possession, and the sheriff performed a lockout in October. In January 2024, Local Homes filed a motion for final judgment, seeking rent through the date of the lockout. In February, Local Homes filed a motion for attorney fees under OCGA § 9-15-14. On March 14, the trial court entered a final judgment awarding Local Homes (1) $10,554.41 plus interest against Stubbs, which included $8,800.41 in rent and $1,500.00 in attorney fees under OCGA § 19-15-14, and (2) $7,020.00 in attorney fees under OCGA § 9-15-14 against Miller. On April 15, Miller filed an application for discretionary review of the March 14 order, arguing that the trial court did not permit Stubbs to present evidence or assert an affirmative defense to the dispossessory action and that the trial court erred in awarding attorney fees under OCGA § 9-15-14. We granted Miller’s application on May 9. See Case No. A24D0316 (May 9, 2024). Miller and Stubbs then filed the underlying notice of appeal on May 20, seeking to appeal both the March 14 order and the trial court’s subsequent order requiring Miller and Stubbs each to post a supersedeas bond.
“It is incumbent upon this [c]ourt to inquire into its own jurisdiction.”
State
of Ga. v. Singh
,
In connection with the passage of the Superior and State Court Appellate
Practice Act, OCGA § 5-3-1 et seq. (the “Act”),
[1]
effective July 1, 2023, the General
Assembly also amended OCGA § 44-7-56, which governs appeals in dispossessory
actions. See
Radio Sandy Springs, Inc. v. Allen Road Joint Venture
,
Prior to this amendment, OCGA § 44-7-56 stated in relevant part that “[a]ny
judgment by the trial court shall be appealable pursuant to Chapters 2, 3, 6, and 7 of
Title 5, provided that any such appeal shall be filed within seven days of the date such
judgment was entered . . . .” OCGA § 44-7-56 (2022). We interpreted “appeal” in the
*4
prior version of OCGA § 44-7-56 to include both direct and discretionary appeals. See
Born v. Born
,
(a) Any judgment by the trial court shall be appealable pursuant to Chapters 3, 6, and 7 of Title 5.
(b) An appeal made pursuant to subsection (a) of this Code section shall proceed as follows:
(1) A copy of the petition for review filed in the reviewing superior or state court or the notice of appeal shall be filed with the clerk of the trial court within seven days after the date the judgment was entered in the trial court[.]
While the statute expressly requires, in dispossessory actions, that petitions for review to superior or state court and notices of appeal to this Court be filed within seven days of a judgment, the statute does not specifically address the time by which parties must file applications for discretionary appeal in such cases when such applications are required under OCGA § 5-6-35 (a).
When considering the meaning of a statute, a court must “presume that the
General Assembly meant what it said and said what it meant” and afford the statutory
text its “plain and ordinary meaning.”
Deal v. Coleman
,
Dispossessory actions are summary proceedings to determine the disposition
of the property pending trial of any contested issues.
Anita Holdings, LLC v. Outlet
Mall of Savannah, LLC
,
Moreover, under OCGA § 5-6-35 (j), if a party has a right to direct appeal under OCGA § 5-6-34 but files an “otherwise timely” application for discretionary review, *7 we have jurisdiction over that case “and shall grant the application.” (emphasis added). Thus, if the seven-day filing deadline provided for in OCGA § 44-7-56 did not apply to discretionary applications, litigants in dispossessory cases could simply avoid the seven-day deadline by filing an application for discretionary review under OCGA § 5-6-35 within 30 days of the order, which then we would be required to grant under OCGA § 5-6-35 (j).
In this case, Local Homes filed its dispossessory action seeking possession of
the premises, past-due rent, rent accruing through final judgment, and various fees
and costs under the dispossessory statute and later sought attorney fees under OCGA
§ 9-15-14. The trial court awarded Local Homes possession of the premises and,
ultimately in its final order, past due rent under the dispossessory statute in addition
to attorney fees. First in the application for discretionary review and now on appeal,
Miller and Stubbs have challenged the trial court’s rulings throughout this
dispossessory case. This action thus began as and remains a dispossessory action.
Radio Sandy Springs, Inc.
,
For these reasons, we determine that the failure to file an application for
discretionary review or a notice of appeal in this case within seven days of the trial
court’s March 14 order deprives us of jurisdiction over this appeal. See id. at 334
(where the action began and continued as a dispossessory action, the seven-day time
limit of OCGA 44-7-56 applied);
Ray M. Wright, Inc. v. Jones
,
We note that the March 14 order could have been directly appealed because this
action began in state court and because this is not an appeal where the only issue to be
resolved is the amount of rent due and such amount is $2,5000.00 or less. See OCGA
§ 5-6-35 (a) (1), (3), and (11). Although “OCGA § 5-6-35(a) (10) requires that an
appeal of an award of attorney fees made pursuant to OCGA § 9-15-14 be preceded
by the grant of a discretionary application[,] a direct appeal is permitted when it is
appealed as part of a judgment that is directly appealable.”
Capricorn Sys., Inc. v.
Godavarthy
,
Finally, although not enumerated separately as error, the notice of appeal
indicated that Miller and Stubbs would be appealing the trial court’s order requiring
them to pay a supersedeas bond.«
R2. 191 (notice of appeal), 1 (amended notice of
appeal)
» Because this opinion disposes of the appeal upon which the trial court based
its grant of a supersedeas bond, any argument regarding the propriety of the
*10
supersedeas bond order is rendered moot. See
Dubarton Enterprises v. Appalachian
Community Bank
,
Appeal dismissed. Doyle, P. J., and Markle, J., concur .
Notes
[1] The Act establishes a uniform procedure for appeals from inferior courts, such
as magistrate courts, to state or superior courts.
Alger v. Atlanta Auto Restoration,
LLC
,
