History
  • No items yet
midpage
Scott v. Trogdon
151 S.E.2d 18
| N.C. | 1966
|
Check Treatment
151 S.E.2d 18 (1966)
268 N.C. 574

James Wayman SCOTT, Sr.
v.
Earl Walton TROGDON, Jr.

No. 612.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

November 23, 1966.

Ottway Burton, Asheboro, for plaintiff appellant.

Coltrane & Gavin, Asheboro, for defendant appellee.

PER CURIAM.

"[W]hen a trial court sets aside a verdict in its discretion, as here, its action in so doing is not subject to review by appeal to the Supreme Court, in the absence of a manifest abuse of discretion. Walston v. Greene, 246 N.C. 617, 99 S.E.2d 805; Veazey v. City of Durham, 231 N.C. 357, 57 S.E.2d 377; Goodman v. Goodman, 201 N.C. 808, 161 S.E. 686; Bird v. Bradburn, 131 N.C. 488, 42 S.E. 936; Brink v. *19 Black, 74 N.C. 329." Goldston v. Wright, 257 N.C. 279, 125 S.E.2d 462.

Here, as in Goldston, the record discloses no abuse of discretion on the part of the trial court. The appeal is without substance and will be dismissed.

Appeal dismissed.

Case Details

Case Name: Scott v. Trogdon
Court Name: Supreme Court of North Carolina
Date Published: Nov 23, 1966
Citation: 151 S.E.2d 18
Docket Number: 612
Court Abbreviation: N.C.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.