Scott v. State
811 So. 2d 697
Fla. Dist. Ct. App.
2002
Check Treatment
DAVIS, Judge.

David Dwayne Scott challenges his conviction and sentence for armed robbery. He argues that the Public Defender’s representation of both him and his codefend-ant created a conflict that violated his Sixth Amendment right to counsel. We disagree without comment and affirm without prejudice to Scott filing a facially sufficient Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850 motion, if he is able to do so.

Affirmed.

NORTHCUTT, J., and DANAHY, PAUL W., Senior Judge, Concur.