History
  • No items yet
midpage
Scott v. P. Lorillard Co.
109 N.J. Eq. 417
N.J.
1931
Check Treatment

The decree appealed from will be affirmed. The reasons for our determination are as stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Bigelow, and reported in 108 N.J. Eq. 153; except, however, as to such part thereof as expresses an apprehension that the passage of the disputed by-law by the stockholders was beyond their jurisdiction and was an encroachment on the powers of the board of directors. The vice-chancellor's observations in that respect are not essential to the conclusion reached and as to them we reserve opinion.

For affirmance — TRENCHARD, PARKER, LLOYD, CASE, BODINE, DALY, DONGES, VAN BUSKIRK, KAYS, JJ. 9.

For reversal — CAMPBELL, DEAR, WELLS, JJ. 3.

*Page 418

Case Details

Case Name: Scott v. P. Lorillard Co.
Court Name: Supreme Court of New Jersey
Date Published: Dec 5, 1931
Citation: 109 N.J. Eq. 417
Court Abbreviation: N.J.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.