Scott v. Hart ex rel. Fassett
2 Sadler 529 | Pa. | 1886
It was not error to admit the deposition of Coleman. It certainly tended to corroborate the evidence of Corey. The other specifications of error relate to the charge of the court. While some portions thereof may be open to criticism, yet, taken as a whole, it presents the case fairly to the jury. We do not think it is either misleading in its effect, or partial in its character.
Judgment affirmed.