Scott v. Georgia Railway & Power Co.
23 Ga. App. 106 | Ga. Ct. App. | 1918
1. There is no merit in grounds 4, 5, 7, and 8 of the amendment to the motion for new trial.
2. Even if it was error to admit in evidence the copy of the rule of the defendant company, as complained of in ground 6 of the motion for a new trial, it was harmless, as the officer of the company by whom the rule was promulgated had already testified, without objection by plaintiff’s counsel, as to what the rule was and that it was a rule of. the company.
3. The evidence failed to sustain the petition, and the judge did not err in directing a verdict for the defendant.
Judgment affirmed.