History
  • No items yet
midpage
Scott v. . McClung
112 N.E. 1076
NY
1916
Check Treatment

Judgment affirmed, with costs, on the ground that according to the findings unanimously affirmed there was a change of grade; no opinion.

Concur: WILLARD BARTLETT, Ch. J., HISCOCK, CHASE, COLLIN, HOGAN, CARDOZO and SEABURY, JJ.

Case Details

Case Name: Scott v. . McClung
Court Name: New York Court of Appeals
Date Published: Mar 24, 1916
Citation: 112 N.E. 1076
Court Abbreviation: NY
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.