History
  • No items yet
midpage
Sciaky v. Rodgers & Hagerty, Inc.
14 N.E.2d 802
NY
1938
Check Treatment

We are of opinion that interest on the verdict should be added from the time the damage accrued. (See Weprin Glass BuildingCorp. v. Rosoff Subway Constr. Co., 269 N.Y. 672.)

The judgment of the Appellate Division should be reversed and that of the Trial Term affirmed, with costs in this court and in the Appellate Division.

CRANE, Ch. J., LEHMAN, O'BRIEN, HUBBS, LOUGHRAN, FINCH and RIPPEY, JJ., concur.

Judgment accordingly. *Page 485

Case Details

Case Name: Sciaky v. Rodgers & Hagerty, Inc.
Court Name: New York Court of Appeals
Date Published: Apr 12, 1938
Citation: 14 N.E.2d 802
Court Abbreviation: NY
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.