History
  • No items yet
midpage
Schwartz v. Rockey
908 A.2d 267
Pa.
2006
Check Treatment

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 6th day of September, 2006, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is hereby GRANTED, limited to the following:

a. Did the Superior Court misapply the law of election of remedies and therefore incorrectly hold that the trial court misapplied the law when it held that the Plaintiffs were not entitled to rescission because they had effectively affirmed the contract?

b. Did the Superior Court err in holding that proof of fraud alone, without more, is sufficient for a court to award treble damages under the UTPCPL?

Case Details

Case Name: Schwartz v. Rockey
Court Name: Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Date Published: Sep 6, 2006
Citation: 908 A.2d 267
Docket Number: Appeal No. 91 WAL 2006
Court Abbreviation: Pa.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.