Schwartz v. . Rehfuss

198 N.Y. 585 | NY | 1910

Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: CULLEN, Ch. J., GRAY, WERNER, WILLARD BARTLETT, HISCOCK and CHASE, JJ. Dissenting, on the authority of Stokes v.Weston (142 N.Y. 433) and Matter of Tompkins (154 N.Y. 634): EDWARD T. BARTLETT, J.