Schurtz v. Kelley

119 Mich. 383 | Mich. | 1899

Per Curiam.

This case originated in justice’s court. In the circuit court, defendants moved a continuance, which was refused.' Both parties noticed the case for trial. The motion was not made till the second week of the term, and no excuse was shown for delay in making the motion the first day of term, under Cir. Ct. Rule No. 22.

Judgment affirmed.