History
  • No items yet
midpage
Schurtz v. Kelley
119 Mich. 383
Mich.
1899
Check Treatment
Per Curiam.

This case originated in justice’s court. In the circuit court, defendants moved a continuance, which was refused.' Both parties noticed the case for trial. The motion was not made till the second week of the term, and no excuse was shown for delay in making the motion the first day of term, under Cir. Ct. Rule No. 22.

Judgment affirmed.

Case Details

Case Name: Schurtz v. Kelley
Court Name: Michigan Supreme Court
Date Published: Feb 21, 1899
Citation: 119 Mich. 383
Court Abbreviation: Mich.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.