Schultz v. Van Doren

65 N.J. Eq. 764 | N.J. | 1903

Per Curiam.

The decree appealed from in this case is affirmed, for the reasons set forth in the opinion of Vice-Chancellor Pitney, filed in the court of chancery, and reported in 19 Dick. Ch. Rep. 465.

For affirmance — The Chief-Justice, Van Syokel, Dixon, Garrison, Port, Hendrickson, Pitney, Swayze, Bogert, Vredenburgi-i, Voori-iees, Vroom, Green- — 13.

For reversal — None.

Case Details

Case Name: Schultz v. Van Doren

Court Name: Supreme Court of New Jersey

Date Published: Aug 25, 1903

Citation: 65 N.J. Eq. 764

Court Abbreviation: N.J.