History
  • No items yet
midpage
Schults v. BD. OF EDUC. OF TOWNSHIP OF TEANECK
210 A.2d 762
| N.J. | 1965
|
Check Treatment
45 N.J. 2 (1965)
210 A.2d 762

FRANK SCHULTS, JR., A MINOR BY FRANK SCHULTS, HIS FATHER AND NEXT FRIEND, ET AL., PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS,
v.
BOARD OF EDUCATION OF THE TOWNSHIP OF TEANECK, BERGEN COUNTY, NEW JERSEY, ET AL., DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Argued May 17, 1965.
Decided June 1, 1965.

Mr. Milton T. Lasher argued the cause for appellants.

Mr. Irving C. Evers argued the cause for respondents (Messrs. Parisi, Evers & Greenfield, attorneys).

*3 PER CURIAM.

We agree with the Appellate Division's determination (86 N.J. Super. 29 (1964)) that the plaintiffs should first have exhausted their administrative remedies before the Commissioner and State Board of Education. The dismissal of their complaint is:

Affirmed.

For affirmance — Chief Justice WEINTRAUB, and Justices JACOBS, FRANCIS, HALL, SCHETTINO and HANEMAN — 6.

For reversal — None.

Case Details

Case Name: Schults v. BD. OF EDUC. OF TOWNSHIP OF TEANECK
Court Name: Supreme Court of New Jersey
Date Published: Jun 1, 1965
Citation: 210 A.2d 762
Court Abbreviation: N.J.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.