History
  • No items yet
midpage
27 A. 1077
Pa.
1893
Per Curiam,

One of the stipulations contained in the contract sued on is : “ The entire policy shall be void .... if the interest of the insured be not truly stated therein ; .... or if the interest of the insured be other than unconditional and sole ownership.” The uncontradicted evidence was that the title to the property was in the plaintiff and his wife jointly. This, in the absence of any proof of fraud or mistake, as to the insertion of the stipulation above quoted, was a flat bar to plaintiff’s recovery. There was therefore no error in directing a verdict for defendant.

Judgment affirmed.

Case Details

Case Name: Schroedel v. Humboldt Fire Ins.
Court Name: Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Date Published: Nov 13, 1893
Citations: 27 A. 1077; 158 Pa. 459; 1893 Pa. LEXIS 1614; Appeal, No. 197
Docket Number: Appeal, No. 197
Court Abbreviation: Pa.
AI-generated responses must be verified
and are not legal advice.
Log In
    Schroedel v. Humboldt Fire Ins., 27 A. 1077