Schott v. State, 641 So. 2d 465

PER CURIAM.

We vacate defendant’s sentence and remand for resentencing because of an error in the sentencing guidelines scoresheet. The scoresheet reflects that points were assessed for legal constraint based on an outstanding capias, however, the state did not establish that the capias was outstanding at the time these crimes were committed. Kinman v. State, 550 So.2d 1190, 1191 (Fla. 5th DCA 1989).

Defendant also argues that the trial court failed to adequately determine whether his plea was voluntary. Because this is a direct appeal from a guilty plea, and defendant made no motion in the trial court to withdraw the plea, we affirm on that issue. Robinson v. State, 373 So.2d 898, 902 (Fla.1979).

REVERSED IN PART AND AFFIRMED IN PART.

ANSTEAD, KLEIN and PARIENTE, JJ., concur.

Case Details

Case Name: Schott v. State

Court Name: District Court of Appeal of Florida

Date Published: Aug 17, 1994

Citations: 641 So. 2d 465; 1994 WL 440576; 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 8100; No. 93-3366

Docket Number: No. 93-3366

Court Abbreviation: Fla. Dist. Ct. App.