Scholtes v. State, 27 So. 3d 175

27 So. 3d 175

Fla. Dist. Ct. App.

2010

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Robinson v. State, 373 So.2d 898 (Fla.1979). In this appeal pursuant to Anders, 1 Appellant’s pro se brief raises issues of an involuntary plea which were not preserved for appeal by the filing of a motion to withdraw his plea. This affirmance is without prejudice to Appellant’s right to assert such issues in a timely and sufficient rule 3.850 motion for post-conviction relief.

GROSS, C.J., STEVENSON and LEVINE, JJ., concur.

Notes

. Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967).