Schmitt v. Werner Enterprises, Inc.Schmitt v. Werner Enterprises, Inc.
—Judgment unani
Supreme Court did not err in admitting evidence of plaintiff’s past psychological problems. That evidence was relevant on the issue of causation with respect to defendants’ theory that plaintiff’s psychological injuries preexisted the accident. Given the conflicting proof concerning the nature, extent and cause of plaintiff’s injuries (see, Harris v Moyer,
The court did not err in accepting the payment by defendant Patricia Kurowski of money into court and limiting her liability for interest pro rata. Pursuant to
We have considered plaintiff’s remaining contention and conclude that it is without merit. (Appeal from Judgment of Supreme Court, Erie County, Mahoney, J. — Negligence.) Present — Pine, J. P., Wisner, Scudder and Kehoe, JJ.