History
  • No items yet
midpage
Schlumpf v. Kahaley
57 Wash. 698
Wash.
1910
Check Treatment
Per Curiam.

Action to recover the value of two cases of cigars, shipped from Tampa, Florida, to Seattle and consigned to appellant. *699The respondent is a drayman and, upon the arrival of the cigars at Seattle, he obtained the cases from the railway company for delivery to appellant. Plaintiff, claiming not to have received the cigars, brought the action, and the court below, finding delivery had been made, gave judgment in favor of defendant, and plaintiff appeals.

The only error assigned is that the evidence does not support the findings of fact. This assignment of error necessitated a careful reading of the evidence and, after having done so, we find ample testimony to sustain the findings. It would serve no good purpose, and would only add unnecessary length to this opinion, to recite the evidence here. It is sufficient to say that the court below was justified by the evidence in the record in making its findings of fact and conclusions of law, and entered the proper judgment thereon.

The judgment is sustained.

Case Details

Case Name: Schlumpf v. Kahaley
Court Name: Washington Supreme Court
Date Published: Feb 4, 1910
Citation: 57 Wash. 698
Docket Number: No. 8284
Court Abbreviation: Wash.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.