History
  • No items yet
midpage
Schlesinger v. Kessell
71 N.J.L. 340
N.J.
1904
Check Treatment
Per Curiam.

The nonsuit disclosed byr the record was sustained in the Supreme Court upon the authority of Stout v. Humphrey, 40 Vroom 436.

We think this conclusion correct, and the judgment must therefore he affirmed.

For affirmance — The Chancellor, Dixon, Garrison, Pitney, Bogert, Tredenburgh, Vroom, Green, Gray. 9.

For reversal — None.

Case Details

Case Name: Schlesinger v. Kessell
Court Name: Supreme Court of New Jersey
Date Published: Dec 9, 1904
Citation: 71 N.J.L. 340
Court Abbreviation: N.J.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.