History
  • No items yet
midpage
Schleimer v. McMillan
79 Misc. 2d 829
N.Y. App. Term.
1974
Check Treatment

Memorandum. Judgment unanimously modified by reducing the amount of plaintiff’s recovery by the sum of $202.36, with appropriate interest and costs on the amount due as reduced; as so modified, judgment affirmed, without costs.

In this suit by plaintiff to recover on a retail installment contract, she is not entitled to attorney’s fees on the buyer’s default where the contract states: 1 ‘ Buyer agrees to pay an attorney’s fee of fifteen (15) percent of the amount due and payable under this contract when same is referred to an attorney, not a salaried employee of the holder, for collection ”.

In the case at bar, the attorney was plaintiff’s husband who was involved in the matter from the very outset, commencing with his credit check of the defendant. We feel that this contract was therefore never “ referred to an attorney” for collection, since he was an integral part of the entire transaction.

Concur: Hogan, P. J., Glickman and McCullough, JJ.

Case Details

Case Name: Schleimer v. McMillan
Court Name: Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
Date Published: Feb 27, 1974
Citation: 79 Misc. 2d 829
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. App. Term.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.