History
  • No items yet
midpage
Schlarb v. Hartwell
129 Ohio St. 493
Ohio
1935
Check Treatment

It is ordered and adjudged by this court, that the judgment of the Court of Appeals be, and the same is hereby, affirmed for the reason that this cause was heard by the Court of Appeals on appeal and no bill of exceptions was presented to and allowed by the Court of Appeals. Section 11566, General Code. (Hill v. Bassett, 27 Ohio St. 597; Detroit, Toledo Ironton Rd. Co. v. Blaum, 120 Ohio St. 612, 169 N.E. 297; andMicklethwait v. City of Portsmouth, 110 Ohio St. 514,144 N.E. 274.)

Judgment affirmed.

WEYGANDT, C.J., STEPHENSON, WILLIAMS, JONES, MATTHIAS, DAY and ZIMMERMAN, JJ., concur. *Page 494

Case Details

Case Name: Schlarb v. Hartwell
Court Name: Ohio Supreme Court
Date Published: May 22, 1935
Citation: 129 Ohio St. 493
Docket Number: 24814
Court Abbreviation: Ohio
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.