Schimkevitz v. Bingham
125 A.D. 792
N.Y. App. Div.
1908
Check Treatment

Lead Opinion

Per Curiam :

The question presented on this appeal is the same as that presented in the casez of Shepard v. Bingham (125 App. Div. 784), decided herewith, and for the reasons there stated the order appealed from is reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and the motion for an injunction denied, with ten dollars costs.

Present — Ingeaham, McLaughlin, Laughlin, Claeke and Scott, JJ.





Concurrence Opinion

Laughlin, J. (concurring):

I concur in the reversal of the injunction order in this case upon the grounds stated in my concurring memorandum in Eden Musee American Co., Ltd., v. Bingham (125 App. Div, 780, 784), argued and decided herewith, which apply to facts here presented.

Order reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion denied, with ten dollars costs.