History
  • No items yet
midpage
Schieffelin v. Hawkins
1 Daly 289
New York Court of Common Pleas
1863
Check Treatment

By the Court.

Daly, F. J.

I have already expressed my views upon this case at Special Term in overruling the de*296muvrer to the complaint, and have nothing to add to the rear sons I then gave, in support of the conclusions that the plaintiffs were entitled to the equitable relief which they seek in the action. If the action is maintainable, the injunction to restrain Hawkins from disposing of the note is a necessary part of the relief sought, and the motion to vacate it was therefore properly denied.

The order appealed from should he affirmed with costs.

Case Details

Case Name: Schieffelin v. Hawkins
Court Name: New York Court of Common Pleas
Date Published: Jan 15, 1863
Citation: 1 Daly 289
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.