History
  • No items yet
midpage
Schermerhorn v. . the Mohawk Bank
1 N.Y. 125
| NY | 1847
|
Check Treatment

There is no difference in principle between this case and the one cited at the bar. The motion to open a regular default is always a question of practice, addressed to the discretion of the Court in which the suit is pending; and it is not, in its nature, a proper matter for review in an Appellate Court. This is so, whatever may be the ground on which the motion was decided.

Appeal dismissed.

Case Details

Case Name: Schermerhorn v. . the Mohawk Bank
Court Name: New York Court of Appeals
Date Published: Nov 5, 1847
Citation: 1 N.Y. 125
Court Abbreviation: NY
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.