Scheinman v. Bloch
98 N.J.L. 571
N.J.
1923
Check Treatment
Per Curiam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Parker in the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — The Chancellor, Swayze, Trenchard, Bergen, Minturn, Black, Katzenbach, White, Heppenhetmer, Williams, Gardner, Ackérson, Van Buskirk, JJ. 13.

For reversad — None.