Scheinman v. BlochScheinman v. Bloch
Feb 1, 1923
Versions:119 A. 92698 N.J.L. 5711923 N.J. LEXIS 258
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Parker in the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — The Chancellor, Swayze, Trenchard, Bergen, Minturn, Black, Katzenbach, White, Heppenhetmer, Williams, Gardner, Ackérson, Van Buskirk, JJ. 13.
For reversad — None.