Scheinman v. Bloch
98 N.J.L. 571 | N.J. | 1923
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Parker in the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — The Chancellor, Swayze, Trenchard, Bergen, Minturn, Black, Katzenbach, White, Heppenhetmer, Williams, Gardner, Ackérson, Van Buskirk, JJ. 13.
For reversad — None.
