| Minn. | May 31, 1884
The action is brought by 'a father to recover for the killing, through the alleged negligence of the defendant, of his son, a child 17 months old, whereby the plaintiff, as he alleges, has been and will be deprived of the services of said son. The statute provides: “A cause of action arising out of an injury to the person dies with the person of either party.” Gen. St. 1878, c. 77, § 1.. This is only declaratory of the rule at common law. Insurance Co. v. Brame, 95 U.S. 754" court="SCOTUS" date_filed="1878-01-21" href="https://app.midpage.ai/document/insurance-co-v-brame-89659?utm_source=webapp" opinion_id="89659">95 U. S. 754, and cases cited; Carey v. Berkshire R. Co., 1 Cush. 475. The statute (Gen. St. 1878, c. 77, § 2,) creates a cause of action when death is caused by the wrongful act or omission of
Order reversed.
Dickinson, J., because of illness, took no part in this decision.