5 Pa. 126 | Pa. | 1847
There is only one assignment of error in this record, which is sustained; and the other points are left to stand on the reasons of the judge, which seem to be satisfactory. He erred, however, in charging that the adverse possession of Justus Scheetz did not pass to the plaintiffs by the sheriff’s deed. In Overfield v. Christie, 7 Serg. & Rawle, 177, in which the opinion of Judge Washington in Potts v. Gilbert, 3 Wash. C. C. R. 475, was overruled, it was settled that the adverse possession of an occupant without right might be transferred to a purchaser, and continued by him for the residue of the time necessary to form a bar by the statute of limitations, and this principle the judge, did not controvert. His position — and it is one of which it is difficult to explain the fallacy — was that the locus in quo, having reverted, did not pass by the sheriff’s deed, which conveyed no more than the tract to which it had ceased to be appurtenant; and consequently, that
Judgment reversed, and venire de novo awarded.