History
  • No items yet
midpage
456 U.S. 966
U.S.
1982

Lead Opinion

Affirmed on appeal from D. C. W. D. Mo.






Concurrence Opinion

Justice Rehnquist,

concurring.

Appellant in this case requests that we overrule Kirkpatrick v. Preisler, 394 U. S. 526 (1969). But here the District Court did not invalidate a reapportionment plan duly adopted by the state legislature; it merely adopted a plan of its own when the legislature was unable to reach agreement. This case, therefore, does not require that we address appellant’s suggestion respecting Kirkpatrick v. Preisler, supra.

Case Details

Case Name: Schatzle v. Kirkpatrick
Court Name: Supreme Court of the United States
Date Published: May 17, 1982
Citations: 456 U.S. 966; 102 S. Ct. 2228; No. 81-1731
Docket Number: No. 81-1731
Court Abbreviation: U.S.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Log In