History
  • No items yet
midpage
Schatz v. COMMONWEALTH ANNUITY AND LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
273 S.W.3d 562
Mo. Ct. App.
2008
Check Treatment

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

William Schatz, III, and Kellie Wilburn, individually and as personal representative of the estate of William Schatz, Jr. (“Plaintiffs”), appeal the judgment dismissing their petition against Commonwealth Annuity and Life Insurance Company and Kathleen D. Schatz, n/k/a Kathleen D. Rebmann for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. We find that the trial court did not err in dismissing Plaintiffs’ petition.

An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The trial court’s decision is affirmed under Rule 84.16(b).

Case Details

Case Name: Schatz v. COMMONWEALTH ANNUITY AND LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
Court Name: Missouri Court of Appeals
Date Published: Dec 30, 2008
Citation: 273 S.W.3d 562
Docket Number: ED 91012
Court Abbreviation: Mo. Ct. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Log In