History
  • No items yet
midpage
Schantz v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.
115 N.J.L. 174
N.J.
1935
Check Treatment

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Lloyd in the Supreme Court. *Page 175 For affirmance — THE CHIEF JUSTICE, PARKER, BODINE, HEHER, PERSKIE, VAN BUSKIRK, KAYS, DEAR, WELLS, JJ. 9.

For reversal — None.

Case Details

Case Name: Schantz v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.
Court Name: Supreme Court of New Jersey
Date Published: May 17, 1935
Citation: 115 N.J.L. 174
Court Abbreviation: N.J.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.