History
  • No items yet
midpage
Schantz v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.
115 N.J.L. 174
| N.J. | 1935
|
Check Treatment

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Lloyd in the Supreme Court. *Page 175 For affirmance — THE CHIEF JUSTICE, PARKER, BODINE, HEHER, PERSKIE, VAN BUSKIRK, KAYS, DEAR, WELLS, JJ. 9.

For reversal — None.

Case Details

Case Name: Schantz v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.
Court Name: Supreme Court of New Jersey
Date Published: May 17, 1935
Citation: 115 N.J.L. 174
Court Abbreviation: N.J.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.