History
  • No items yet
midpage
Schaming v. Simkins Industries, Inc.
343 So. 2d 834
Fla.
1977
Check Treatment
PER CURIAM.

The petition for writ of certiorari reflected apparent jurisdiction in this Court. We issued the writ. Upon further consideration of the cause, we conclude that no direct conflict of decisions exists as required by Article V, Section 3(b)(3), Florida Constitution. Therefore, the writ must be and is hereby discharged.

It is so ordered.

OVERTON, C. J., and ADKINS, ENGLAND, SUNDBERG, HATCHETT and KARL, JJ., concur. BOYD, J., dissents.

Case Details

Case Name: Schaming v. Simkins Industries, Inc.
Court Name: Supreme Court of Florida
Date Published: Mar 10, 1977
Citation: 343 So. 2d 834
Docket Number: No. 49382
Court Abbreviation: Fla.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Log In